Black Life Texas
Race and College Admissions Go to The Supreme Court

By Gabriel Wheatley
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on two cases in the next few weeks challenging whether public and private universities can consider a student’s race (color) when making college admissions judgments. Over the course of many years, we have seen groups challenging affirmative action. Walk through the hallways of universities and notice the large number of white professors that dominate in almost every department. When people of color took on the fight for equal representation, even asking for a few positions, this generated holy hell by prejudiced people who resorted to filing reverse discrimination cases. They want to go back to apartheid hiring practices by pretending that the Black community and others do not qualify when the pool they are picking from is often limited.
During the Civil Rights Movement, affirmative action was implemented to address racial inequality in education in a racist society. The Supreme Court has continued to uphold the policy for many years despite occasionally weighing in on its legality and limiting its range. According to an article in the Texas Tribune, “The two lawsuits before the Supreme Court were filed by the group Students for Fair Admissions. The group is led by lawyer Edward Blum, who recruited Texan Abigail Fisher to file a lawsuit against UT-Austin, alleging she was unfairly discriminated against when the school denied her admission in 2008 because she was white. Ultimately, the court narrowly ruled in favor of UT-Austin, finding the university had met legal scrutiny requiring that race considerations provide an educational benefit to students.”
Shamefully, Blum has worked the legal system to make Fisher the poster child of “reverse” racial discrimination. Fisher claimed to have done everything right regarding her admission package. She had solid grades and participated in numerous sports activities during high school. However, she claimed that her “dream” was taken away by a university that refused to admit her because she was born white. Interestingly, nutty!
It is an outright lie that Fisher was denied admission to the University of Texas due to her race (color). Fisher’s attorneys spent tons of time with hundreds of pages of legal documents arguing that Fisher would have been admitted to the university regardless of her race. The manner in which Blum, Fisher, and others have warped the dialogue as the case progressed to the nation’s highest court is undoubtedly a steamroller of fabrication. According to ProPublica investigations, “Neither Fisher nor Blum mentioned . . . . the 168 Black and Latino students with grades as good as or better than Fisher’s who were also denied entry into the university that year.”
The Project on Fair Representation, a nonprofit headed by Edward J. Blum, is anything but fair. In fact, this group is funded by deep pockets and is engaged in filing lawsuits that want to take us back to the “good ole days” that were not equitable for people of color. In the second case, Blum contends that Harvard University infringed on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits the federal government from funding private organizations that engage in racial discrimination. According to Blum, Asian American students are less likely than students of similar race to be accepted into the private university.
This legal mess is designed to remove diversity and inclusion from colleges and universities with a long historical record of denying Black students and people of color admission. According to many scholars, achieving a diverse student body will be more difficult if the Supreme Court rules against race-conscious admissions. Other unintended consequences are burdensome as well. One such concern is continuing effort to belittle Historically Black Colleges and Universities or HBCUs as not being on the same level as the “high-end” schools. Admission officials are concerned that many students of color will choose less selective schools over high-brow selective ones if schools are unable to take a student’s ethnicity into account. According to experts, HBCUs might receive more applications while the continued downgrading of Black schools continues. What high-society white woman is willing to go to Texas Southern University? The double standard still exists.
Many of the greatest leaders in our country have benefited from affirmative action, including the late General Colin Powell. These extreme cases attempt to reverse the positive change that helped students of color and gave back immensely to our country like Powell did. Having the best grades does not always mean the best student. Other factors have to be considered.
Black Life Texas
The Real History of Thanksgiving


The history of Thanksgiving cannot be discussed without recognizing the reality of genocide committed against Native Indigenous people. Free land was the enticement for European settlers to come to the Americas. The Native populations on these lands would have to be removed or conquered to accomplish their goals.
Many foreigners were already slave owners who wanted to plant cash crops using Black slave labor. The history of the United States cannot be fully understood unless one examines “settler colonialism.” Settler colonialism was founded on the ideology of land theft, genocide, and slavery. Those who have written American history with an eraser of bias have found it easy to perpetuate the Thanksgiving myth of Europeans sitting down with Native Americans and enjoying a food feast together—nothing could be further from the truth.
What came before this so-called “Thanksgiving” was murder, genocide, and slavery of Native people before and after the mythical thank you dinner. Puritan settlers came up with the idea of the “Doctrine of Discovery,” a racist law enacted by the Pope of that time and brought to America by the less-than-honorable Christopher Columbus. This is the part of the American origin myth that professors and teachers still ignore to be accepted in the world of historical falsehoods. Settler colonialism is a genocidal policy of murder and land theft to satisfy a false religious belief in racial destiny (also called Manifest Destiny). Settlers required violence to realize their dreams of wealth. No community will willingly give up their land, children, resources, and dignity without a fight, and Indigenous people did not go down without a fight against these ideals that were rooted in a colonial agenda that had a religious spin on it. When European settlers were crossing the ocean and illegally crossing borders, it was something supposedly legal and sanctioned by God.

America was not a virgin land or wilderness filled with wild animals but a land tame to Native people. It was a network of native communities that linked people through roads and trails they carved themselves, which they built long before Europeans arrived. Native people cultivated farmland and crops to survive the harsh winters in the northern parts of America. The Native people knew where the oyster beds were, the water routes, and what plants had medicinal value. Settlers came to America with a culture of conquest and killing that they experienced in hundreds of years of religious savagery between Catholics and Protestants, especially the killing and exploitation of the Irish by the English and Scottish. White supremacy can be traced to the Christian Crusades against Muslims and not to capitalism, though capitalism exploited the idea to the fullest later.
These Europeans did not tame the wilderness. They invaded and murdered the original inhabitants. There are many fake origin stories from one country to the next, as apartheid South Africa once claimed and is now claimed by Israel using similar tactics for decades in a systematic way to force Palestinians from their homes, according to Amnesty International.

The fake Captain John Smith story never mentions his threat to kill all Native women and children if the Native people would not help feed and clothe the settlers from England and provide free labor for the English settlement. When Native people refused, the settlers burned their crops in an attempt to starve out the so-called “Indians.” This would result in the Pequot War, in which settlers would slaughter the Pequot tribe in the 1600s. Unknown to many, this was the first “Thanksgiving,” according to research by historians, in which settlers had a celebration thanking God for their murderous exploits. Scalp hunting was brought to America’s shores by the Scottish Protestants, who also invented the term “Redskin” to describe the bleeding head of one of their victims. Mutilated bloody corpses, which Puritans scalped, were the origin of the term “Redskin.” It was not developed as an indication of “race.” Later in history, the practice of scalping and gutting pregnant Native women would be carried out by the Scotsman Andrew Jackson, whom many now call the “Hitler of America.”
The Thanksgiving Myth is that of smiling “Indians” welcoming the European explorers to America, showing them how to reside in this ‘wilderness,” and sitting down to dinner with them. They supposedly hand their lands off to “frontiersmen,” so these invaders can create an incredible country committed to freedom, opportunity, and Christianity until the end of the world. That is the story — it’s about Native People yielding to settler colonialism. The myth is bloodless and, in numerous ways, an argument for the racist idea of Manifest Racial Destiny. Thus, the Thanksgiving myth was created to present a false history to deny the horrors of American origins and later to invent a fake ideology coined “American Exceptionalism.” American Exceptionalism was derived from these false ideas, created by criminal or ignorant historians, which claim that America is an “Innocent Nation” while other nations may have blood on their hands. Nothing could be further from the real history of America and the truth about Thanksgiving. Today, many of us celebrate family and friends and want nothing to do with the invented narrative. We can always choose to provide our own meanings and, at the same time, educate our community about the lies.
Art
Downtown SA Lights Up for the Holidays

Downtown San Antonio will sparkle this holiday season with an array of lights and holiday events.
Set against the backdrop of one of the city’s most historic and charming walkways, five blocks of Houston Street will buzz with twinkling lights, decorations, entertainers, and vendors from Nov. 24 and runs through January 2.
Additionally, on Nov. 24, kick off the holiday festivities with the Annual H-E-B Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony at Travis Park. Festivities begin at 4 p.m. and include live entertainment, food trucks, letters to Santa, giveaways, holiday crafts, a special visit from Santa, and a movie screening of “The Grinch.” The tree-lighting ceremony begins at 6 p.m., followed by the movie at 7 p.m. This event is free and open to the public.
Get front-row seats to the 42nd Annual Ford Holiday River Parade, which offers a spectacular one-hour parade along the San Antonio River Walk starting at 6 pm at the Tobin Center. This year’s theme, “Holiday Stories,” will kick off the San Antonio tradition. Always held the day after Thanksgiving, the parade and river lighting ceremony will feature 28 illuminated floats and over 100,000 lights (2,250 strands) illuminating the River Walk. The lights turn on from sundown to sunrise every day until the weekend following New Year’s Day. Seating ranges from $15 to $40. It is broadcast live at 7 p.m. at the Arneson River Theatre.
The Rotary Ice Rink, presented by Valero, will also return this fall at Travis Park in downtown San Antonio. Since 2019, nearly 200,000 people have enjoyed the rink and surrounding festivities. For more information, including hours of operation, pricing, and specials, visit (rotaryicerink.com).
For more events, go to (VisitSanAntonio.com).
Black Life Texas
Black Soldiers’ Convictions Overturned – A Century Later!

More than 100 years later, the U.S. Army recently overturned the convictions of the 110 Black soldiers of the 3rd Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment (also known as the Buffalo Soldiers), who were falsely found guilty following the World War I-era Houston Riots.
The records of these soldiers will be corrected, to the extent possible, to characterize their military service as honorable. Seventeen of these men are buried at Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery in San Antonio. In 2022, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs unveiled a sign telling the story of these men to educate visitors about what happened.
Secretary of the Army Christine Wormuth said, “After a thorough review, the Board has found that these soldiers were wrongly treated because of their race and were not given fair trials. By setting aside their convictions and granting honorable discharges, the Army is acknowledging past mistakes and setting the record straight.”
The Houston Riots took place on Aug. 23, 1917, following months of racial provocations against members of the 24th — including the violent arrest and assault of two Black soldiers. Following the assaults and amid rumors of additional threats to soldiers, a group of more than 100 Black soldiers seized weapons and marched into the city, where clashes erupted. The violence left 19 people dead.
In the months that followed, the Army convicted 110 soldiers in a process that was, according to historians, characterized by numerous irregularities. Ultimately, 19 men were executed in the largest mass execution of American soldiers by the U.S. Army. The first set of executions occurred in secrecy and within a day of sentencing, leading the Army to implement an immediate regulatory change that prohibited future executions without review by the War Department and the President.
In 2020 and 2021, the South Texas College of Law petitioned the Army to review the convictions. Shortly after, the Army received petitions from retired general officers requesting clemency for all 110 soldiers.
“As a Texas native, I was grateful to participate in this process early in my tenure at Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery in San Antonio, and I am proud that the Army has now formally restored honor to soldiers of the 3-24 and their families,” said Under Secretary of the Army Gabe Camarillo. “We cannot change the past; however, this decision provides the Army and the American people an opportunity to learn from this difficult moment in our history.”
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has been deeply involved as this case has unfolded and is prepared to assist any family members upon receipt of the corrected records. Relatives of the soldiers may be entitled to benefits. Family members or other interested parties may request a copy of the corrected records from the National Archives and Records Administration, in accordance with NARA Archival Records Request procedures found at (archives.gov/veterans/military-service-records).
-
Black Life Texas4 weeks ago
The Untold Story of Native Americans Heritage Month
-
Black Life Texas4 weeks ago
Get Ready for Fashionetta
-
Black Life Texas4 weeks ago
Black Veterans: Fighting Two Wars
-
Business3 weeks ago
San Antonio Airport Ranked #2 in U.S. by The Wall Street Journal
-
Black Life Texas3 weeks ago
The Historical Lack of Black Publishers
-
Black Life Texas4 weeks ago
Free Native American Festival at the Briscoe
-
Black Life Texas2 weeks ago
Carver Annual Fundraiser Dec. 2
-
Black Life Texas2 weeks ago
The History of Soulful Thanksgiving Sides
You must be logged in to post a comment.